Showing posts with label three colors: blue. Show all posts
Showing posts with label three colors: blue. Show all posts

Monday, October 14, 2013

Movie Response: Blue

This was easily my favorite movie we've seen in the class so far. It was so creatively made. I enjoyed immersing myself in the sound which made every action poignant and haunting. The most memorable instance for me was the scene in which the family is pulled over on the side of the road. The low-angle camera with soft focus background zooms in on a liquid dripping underneath the car which immediately alerts the audience of a looming car accident. If an audience member hasn't realized what the dripping is, they later realize that it was brake fluid. It was subtle but an amazing use of foreshadowing. 

From what I understood of the movie, the sudden orchestral interlude is a representation of Julie's subconscious or recollection of the accident haunting her in the form of a melody. It begins every time someone questions her about it, at which point the screen goes black. Part of the reason may be because Julie shuts down compulsively, but it may also be because she has no recollection of the accident or has intentionally blocked it.

Although I know some people found that parts of it were hard to follow, I think it's an accurate representation of Julie's perspective because her losses rendered her alienated, hollow, and confused. Altogether it was a beautiful movie. 

Sunday, October 13, 2013

Movie Response - Three Colors: Blue


The movie “Three Colors: Blue” was quite different than what I expected to be. During multiple points in the movie I thought I understood what was going to happen but then there would always be some kind of twist. Kind of like the movie Psycho, what you expected turned into something complexly different. With the movie being in a different language we were all forced to pay very close attention when reading the subtitles. I think this was good because it can be easy for us to fall asleep during a movie, even if it is a good movie. The concept of the movie is still a little unclear for me. I felt like there was no real ending to the movie. Every intense situation that happened in the movie was left for the viewer to make up his or her own conclusion about it. I think the strong sounds in the movie that happened after an intense situation worked very well. I also like the blank screens, but a few times I got confused and thought the blank screen meant that the movie was about to end. Overall I think the duration and intensity of the sounds can make of break your work. This was a great movie to help us understand how sound works in time-based media. For me personally I liked how the blank screens also gave you time to digest what you just saw. It gives you a minute for it all to just sink in.  I want to use this method within my project. Even though the movie was something that I did expect I really enjoyed it. It gets really boring when you can predict a whole movie and this movie did the opposite of that.

Three Colors: Blue Response

The film Three Colors: Blue is really a dramatic film. The lighting made ​​in blue characterizing all the drama and melancholy of the film were very successful. I really liked that. But one thing caught my attention, the audio. In the film they chose to use to demonstrate various audio scene changes or important parts in a scene. I thought a little too much. The sound is loud and just troubling me. I believe that when my classmates watched the movie in class, also had that impression.

Saturday, October 12, 2013

Three Colors: Blue Response

The film Three Colors: Blue was an emotionally charged drama which told the story of a woman who lost her family after a fatal car crash. The overall tone of the film, along with the dramatic lighting, the sudden and violent orchestral pieces, and the recurring use of the color blue (which has long symbolized melancholy) emphasize repeatedly that this story is sombre and full of harsh and unpleasant turns for our protagonist. The most notable recurring theme is the use of explosively loud bursts of the unfinished symphony Julie's husband had been composing before his death. These sounds are often used as a means of conveying the scene has elicited some sort creative response from Julie, who then goes on to help finish the piece at the end of the film, but I personally found the music to be mostly superfluous in the context with which they were used. Typically, we assume such jarring shift in audio to be indicative of a scene change, but often times it was thrown in oddly in the middle of an awkward pause in dialogue, almost as if to shout "Look! This here, this is an important scene! Julie is experiencing emotion or something!" While it was necessary, and it's meaning and intent are clear enough, I felt as though it's actual execution could have been carried out better, and that some of this meaning was almost lost in context. Otherwise, the audio did help meld together what would otherwise have almost seemed like a disjointed series of events which somewhat lacked in rising action, climax, and falling action. This is not a flaw of the movie, however, as it reflects real life--which rarely actually has such clean cut instances.