You were very serious
when you said it was a tuff reading. The wording is interesting it takes a
simple theme but describes it in a complex way. There was some strange wordy
information that I believe could have been taken out. I wish this reading was
more to the point because after reading it I’m still trying to digest
everything I just read. I understand how it speaks of the camera and film and
some of the history behind it but there was definitely a lot more that was
there that I could not completely interpret. I’m not quite sure why the writer
feels so strongly about the development of film and the history behind it. They
seem to be a bit bias about things and I wish I could have a full understanding
to be able to respond properly. I liked the writing more in the beginning than
I did later on. At first it seemed to be kind of poetic and then it slowly
veered out into a one sided argument.
No comments:
Post a Comment