theCAMERAeye

After reading it, The Camera Eye speaks to me about the processes of editing, critiquing, and the limitations of imagination. Even after re-reading it, it is difficult to decipher the full meaning of the text. As I read the introduction the first time, I couldn't help but feel a sense of mockery from the author towards critics. Shamelessly defying where true art comes from, and their process of how an audience experiences a piece. As the article continues to develop its argument, It seemed to be speaking about the impossibility of true imagination, because once we imagine it, it can become a reality.

Overall, while it proves to be a very interesting article overall, the main point the author is attempting to make is lost amongst all the flattery in the language.